Evaluation of scores of the 33rd and 34th Junior European Championships in Men’s Artistic Gymnastics


  • Merve Koca Kosova Dokuz Eylül University
  • Sercin Kosova




artistic gymnastics, score analysis, difficulty, execution, all- around


To determine the effects of difficulty (D), execution (E), and total score of the apparatus on the all-around total score, and compare the scores of the 33rd and 34th Junior European Championships in Men’s Artistic Gymnastics (JECMAG). The data of the study are the all-around scores of the final of the 33rd (2018) and 34th (2020) JECMAG. The all-around total score (AATS), apparatus total score, D and E score of each apparatus were evaluated. A multiple regression was run to predict AATS2018 from the total score of the vault, pommel horse, horizontal bar, floor exercise, parallel bars, and AATS2020 from the parallel bars (p<.001). Multiple regression analysis was run to predict AATS2018 from scores of vault D, pommel horse D, vault E, horizontal bar E, horizontal bar D, pommel horse E, floor exercise D scores and AATS2020 from parallel bars D, parallel bars E, pommel horse E scores (p<.001). In the 34th JECMAG, there were significant decreases in AATS and some apparatus scores compared with the 33rd JECMAG. Although the effect of apparatus scores changed according to the competition dynamics, the most important apparatus seemed to be the vault (2018) and parallel bars (2020). It can be concluded that D scores were better predictors than E scores. Coaches can take these findings into account when determining competition strategies. 


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


Arkaev, L., & Suchilin, N. G. (2004). Gymnastics: how to create champions: Meyer & Meyer Verlag.

Atikovic, A. (2020). Anthropometric Characteristics of Olympic Female and Male Artistic Gymnasts from 1996 to 2016. International Journal of Morphology, 38(4).https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022020000400990

Atiković, A., Kamenjašević, E., Mujanović, A. N., Užičanin, E., Tabaković, M., & Ćurić, M. (2020). Differences between all-around results in women’s artistic gymnastics and ways of minimizing them. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 12(3), 80-91.

Atiković, A., Mujanović, A. N., Petković, E., Kalinski, S. D., & Kremnický, J. (2020). Analysis of the differences in the results of the year 2019 between the world best juniors and seniors in men's artistic gymnasts. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20(3), 1265-1271.

Atiković, A., & Smajlović, N. (2011). Relation between vault difficulty values and biomechanical parameters in men's artistic gymnastics. Science of gymnastics journal, 3(3), 91-105.

Bouchard, C., Tremblay, A., Leblanc, C., Lortie, G., Savard, R., & Theriault, G. (1983). A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 37(3), 461-467. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/37.3.461

Čuk, I., & Atiković, A. (2009). Are Disciplines in All-around Men’s Artistic Gymnastics Equal. Sport Scientific & Practical Aspects, 6(1/2), 8-13.

Cuk, I., Fink, H., & Leskosek, B. (2012). Modeling the final score in artistic gymnastics by different weights of difficulty and execution. Science of gymnastics journal, 4(1), 73.

Čuk, I., & Forbes, W. (2010). How apparatus difficulty scores affect all around results in men’s artistic gymnastics. Science of gymnastics journal, 2(3), 57-63.

Čuk, I., Karacsony, I. (2004). Vault: methods, ideas, curiosities, history: ŠTD Sangvinčki.

Erceg, T., Delaš Kalinski, S., & Milić, M. (2014). The score differences between elite europen junior and senior women gymnasts. Kinesiology: International journal of fundamental and applied kinesiology, 46(Supplement 1), 88-94.

Kruse, D. W., Nobe, A. S., & Billimek, J. (2020). Injury incidence and characteristics for elite, male, artistic USA gymnastics competitions from 2008 to 2018. British journal of sports medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101297

Linge, S., Hallingstad, O., & Solberg, F. (2006). Modelling the parallel bars in Men’s Artistic Gymnastics. Human movement science, 25(2), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.11.008

Massidda, M., & Calò, C. M. (2012). Performance scores and standings during the 43rd Artistic Gymnastics World Championships, 2011. Journal of sports sciences, 30(13), 1415-1420. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.710759

Matthews, C., & Welk, G. (2002). Use of self-report instruments to assess physical activity. Physical activity assessments for health-related research, 107, 123.

Meissner, L., Rai, A., & Rotthoff, K. W. (2021). The superstar effect in gymnastics. Applied Economics, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1869170

Mkaouer, B., Hammoudi-Nassib, S., Amara, S., & Chaabène, H. (2018). Evaluating the physical and basic gymnastics skills assessment for talent identification in men’s artistic gymnastics proposed by the International Gymnastics Federation. Biology of Sport, 35(4), 383. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.78059

Moeskops, S., Oliver, J. L., Read, P. J., Cronin, J. B., Myer, G. D., & Lloyd, R. S. (2019). The Physiological Demands of Youth Artistic Gymnastics: Applications to Strength and Conditioning. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 41(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000404

Örs, B. S. (2020). The effect of difficulty and execution scores on total ranking during 2019 Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championships. African Educational Research Journal, 8(1)(Special Issue ), 37-42.

Schärer, C., Lehmann, T., Naundorf, F., Taube, W., & Hübner, K. (2019). The faster, the better? Relationships between run-up speed, the degree of difficulty (D-score), height and length of flight on vault in artistic gymnastics. PloS one, 14(3), e0213310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213310

Urzeală, C., Aura, B., Marton, M., & Courteix, D. (2020). Heart Rate Variability in Male Artistic Gymnastics A Case study. Anthropological Researches and Studies, 1(10), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.26758/10.1.17






Original Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)