Effects of concurrent discrimination tasks on gait in healthy subjects
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the cost of performing a concurrent discrimination and decision-making task (dual-task cost, DTC) while walking to gait kinematics and dynamic stability. The study included 28 healthy young adults without any motor and/or cognitive disorder. An intra-group repeated measures design was applied. Participants were instructed to walk either under normal conditions or while performing an executive task. The executive tasks involved discriminating the color of the lights of two traffic lights and stopping as rapidly as possible when the traffic lights turned red simultaneously. A kinematic analysis of the gait cycle was performed by 3D photogrammetry. Gait cadence and step variability were measured using the GAITRite® treadmill. The results obtained confirm that the duration of single-support during the two steps of the gait cycle tends to decrease in dual task conditions. An especial impact was observed on step length, which explained the 2% reduction in the velocity of displacement of the center of mass. Variability in step time and length increased with dual tasking. No differences were found among dynamic stability factors. We propose using a DTC differential for subjects with motor and/or cognitive disorders as compared to healthy individuals.Downloads
Metrics
References
Abbud, G.A.C., Li, K.Z.H., & DeMont, G.R. (2009). Attentional requirements of walking according to the gait phase and onset of auditory stimuli. Gait and Posture, 30: 227-232.
Abdel-Aziz, Y.I., & Karara, H.M. (1971). Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. Proceedings of the ASP/UI Symposium on Close Range Photogrammetry, pp. 1–18. Falls Church, VA: American Society of Photogrammetry.
Al-Yahya, E., Dawes, H., Smith, L., Dennis, A., Howells, K., & Cockburn, J. (2011). Cognitive motor interference while walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35: 715-728.
Belghali, M., Chastan, N., Davenne, D., & Decker, L.M. (2017). Improving dual-task walking paradigms to detect prodromal Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases. Frontiers in Neurology, 8 (22),207 https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00207
Duque, J., Lew, D., Mazzocchio, R., Oliver, E., & Ivry, R.B. (2010). Evidence for two concurrent inhibitory mechanisms during response preparation. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(10), 3796- 3802.
Ebersbach, G., Dimitrijevic, M.R., & Poewe, W. (1995). Influence of concurrent tasks on gait: a dual-task approach. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81:107–13.
Gao, J., Wong-Lin, K., Holmes, P., Simen, P., & Cohen, J. D. (2009). Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time tasks: Decomposition and synthesis of mechanisms. Neural Computation, 21(9), 2407-2436
Goodale, M.A., & Westwood, D. A. (2004). An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 203–211.
Gutiérrez-Cruz, C., Miangolarra, J.C., & Rojas, F.J. (2016). Effect of dual-task-induced uncertainty on gait biomechanics in patients with multiple sclerosis with 2-6.5 EDSS grade. Gait and Posture, 49:30-35.
Harada, T., Miyai, I., Suzuki, M., & Kubota, K. (2009). Gait capacity affects cortical activation patterns related tospeed control in the elderly. Experimental Brain Research, 193: 445-454.
Hardy, S.E., Perera, S., Roumani, Y.F., Chandler, J.M. & Studenski, S.A. (2007). Improvement in usual gait speed predicts better survival in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55: 1727-1734.
Iseki, K., Hanakawa, T., Shinozaki, J., Nankaku, M., & Fukuyama, H. (2008). Neural mechanisms involved in mental imagery and observation of gait. Neuroimage, 41: 1021-1031.
Ivanoff, J., Branning, P., & Marois, R. (2009).Mapping the pathways of information processing from sensation to action in four distinct sensorimotor tasks. Human Brain Mapping, 30(12): 4167-4186.
Kelly, V.E., Janke, A.A., & Shumway-Cook, A. (2010). Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults. Experimental Brain Research, 207:65–73
Kelly, V.E., Eusterbrock, A.J., & Shumway-Cook, A. (2012) A review of dual-task walking deficits in people with Parkinson’s disease: motor and cognitive contributions, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Parkinson's Disease, 12 918719. doi:10.1155/2012/918719
Lajoie, Y., Teasdale, N., Bard, C., & Fleury, M. (1993). Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Experimental Brain Research, 97:139– 44.
Lajoie, Y., Teasdale, N., Bard, C., & Fleury, M. (1996). Upright standing and gait: are there changes in attentional requirements related to normal aging?. Experimental Brain Research, 22:185–98.
Leva de, P. (1996). Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. Journal of Biomechanics, 29, 9 (1223-1230).
Milner, A.D., & Goodale, M.A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University.
Nascimbeni, A., Caruso, S., Salatino, A., Carenza, M., Rigano, M., Raviolo, A. & Ricci, R. (2015). Dual task-related gait changes in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Functional Neurology, 30 (1): 59–65.
Nakamoto, H. & Mori, S. (2012). Experts in fast-ball sports reduce anticipation timing cost by developing inhibitory control. Brain and Cognition, 80: 23–32.
Nordin, E., Moe-Nilssen, R., Ramnemark, A., & Lundin-Olsson, L. (2010). Changes in step-width during dual-task walking predicts falls. Gait and Posture, 32: 92-97.
Palombaro, K.M., Craik, R.I., Mangione, K.K., & Tomlinson, J.D. (2006). Determining meaningful changes in gait speed after hip fracture. Physical therapy, 86:809-816.
Rankin, J.K., Woollacott, M., Shumway-Cook, A., & Brown, L. (2000) A neuromuscular analysis of the influence of a cognitive task on postural stability in young and older adults. Journal of Gerontologia series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, 55(3):M112–9.
Rochester, L., Galna, B., Lord, S., & Burn, D. (2014) The nature of dual-task interference during gait in incident Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience, 265:83–94.
Schluter, N.D., Rushworth, M.F., Passingham, R.E., & Mills, K.R. (1998). Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain and Cognition, 121: 785- 799.
Sheridan, P.L., & Hausdorff, J.M. (2007). The role of higher-level cognitive function in gait: executive dysfunction contributes to fall risk in Alzheimer´s disease. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 24: 125-137
Yogev-Seligman, G., Hausdorff, J., & Giladi, N. (2008). The role of executive function and attention in gait. Movement Disorders, 23: 329-342.
Van der Kamp, J., Rivas, F., Van Doorn, H., & Savelsbergh, G. (2008). Ventral and dorsal system contributions to visual anticipation in fast ball sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 39(2), 100-130
Wood, G.A., & Jenning, S.L. (1979).On the use of spline functions for data smoothing. Journal of Biomechanics, 12: 477–479.
Woollacott, M., & Shumway-Cood, A. (2002). Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait and Posture, 16: 1-14
Zatsiorsky, V.M., & Seluyanov, V.N. (1985). Estimation of the mass and inertia characteristics of the human body by means of the best predictive regressions equations. En Winter, D y col (Eds): Biomechanics IX-B (233-239). Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, Illinois.
